United Nations. Gender equality. Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. Sustainable Development Goals https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/ (2015).
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. Am. Psychol. 56, 109–118 (2001). This is the first comprehensive articulation of ambivalent sexism theory.
Hammond, M. D. & Cimpian, A. “Wonderful but weak”: children’s ambivalent attitudes toward women. Sex Roles 84, 76–90 (2021).
Gutierrez, B. C., Halim, M. L. D., Martinez, M. A. & Arredondo, M. The heroes and the helpless: the development of benevolent sexism in children. Sex Roles 82, 558–569 (2020).
de Lemus, S., Moya, M. & Glick, P. When contact correlates with prejudice: adolescents’ romantic relationship experience predicts greater benevolent sexism in boys and hostile sexism in girls. Sex Roles 63, 214–225 (2010).
Ferragut, M., Blanca, M. J., Ortiz-Tallo, M. & Bendayan, R. Sexist attitudes and beliefs during adolescence: a longitudinal study of gender differences. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 14, 32–43 (2017).
Glick, P. et al. Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 763–775 (2000).
de Geus, R., Ralph-Morrow, E. & Shorrocks, R. Understanding ambivalent sexism and its relationship with electoral choice in Britain. Br. J. Polit. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000612 (2022).
Connor, R. A., Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. in The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (eds Sibley, C. G. & Barlow, F. K.) 295–320 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).
Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C. & van Anders, S. M. The future of sex and gender in psychology: five challenges to the gender binary. Am. Psychol. 74, 171–193 (2019). This article presents a compelling analysis of how current psychological insights challenge binary notions of gender, which suggests the need to broaden sexism research.
van der Gaag, N., Heilman, B., Gupta, T., Nembhard, C. & Barker, G. State of the world’s fathers: unlocking the power of men’s care. ProMundo https://promundoglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/BLS19063_PRO_SOWF_REPORT_015.pdf (2019).
ONS. Families and the labour market UK: 2019. Census 2021 https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/articles/familiesandthelabourmarketengland/2019 (2019).
Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J. & Tertilt, M. This time it’s different: the role of women’s employment in a pandemic recession. National Bureau of Economic Research http://www.nber.org/papers/w27660.pdf (2020).
Giurge, L. M., Whillans, A. V. & Yemiscigil, A. A multicountry perspective on gender differences in time use during COVID-19. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018494118 (2021).
Golombok, S. Modern Families: Parents And Children In New Family Forms (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
The Williams Institute. How many same-sex couples in the US are raising children? UCLA https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Same-Sex-Parents-Jul-2018.pdf (2018).
Goudarzi, S., Badaan, V. & Knowles, E. D. Neoliberalism and the ideological construction of equity beliefs. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1431–1451 (2022).
Government Equalities Office. Gender equality monitor: tracking progress on gender equality. Gov.uk https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/814080/GEO_GEEE_Strategy_Gender_Equality_Monitor_tagged.pdf (2019).
Chisango, T. & Javangwe, G. Are people better at recognizing ambivalent sexism on the basis of the non-standard profiles than the standard ASI ones? Sex Roles 67, 69–82 (2012).
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. The ambivalence toward men inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychol. Women Q. 23, 519–536 (1999).
Glick, P. et al. Bad but bold: ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 713–728 (2004).
Allport, G. W. The Nature Of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, 1954).
Eagly, A. H. & Mladinic, A. Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 5, 1–35 (1994).
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C. & Glick, P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 77–83 (2007).
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70, 491–512 (1996). This article presents the development of the original ambivalent sexism inventory.
Salomon, K. et al. The experiences with ambivalent sexism inventory (EASI). Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42, 235–253 (2020).
Becker, J. C. & Wright, S. C. Yet another dark side of chivalry: benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101, 62–77 (2011).
Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. The burden of benevolent sexism: how it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 35, 633–642 (2005).
Bosson, J. K., Pinel, E. C. & Vandello, J. A. The emotional impact of ambivalent sexism: forecasts versus real experiences. Sex Roles 62, 520–531 (2010).
Rudman, L. A. & Heppen, J. B. Implicit romantic fantasies and women’s interest in personal power: a glass slipper effect? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 1357–1370 (2003).
Bohner, G., Ahlborn, K. & Steiner, R. How sexy are sexist men? Women’s perception of male response profiles in the ambivalent sexism inventory. Sex Roles 62, 568–582 (2010).
Hopkins-Doyle, A., Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M. & Calogero, R. M. Flattering to deceive: why people misunderstand benevolent sexism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 116, 167–192 (2019).
Leone, R. M., Schipani-McLaughlin, A. M., Haikalis, M. & Parrott, D. J. The “white knight” effect: benevolent sexism accounts for bystander intervention in party situations among high status men. Psychol. Men. Masc. 21, 704–709 (2020).
Moya, M., Glick, P., Expósito, F., de Lemus, S. & Hart, J. It’s for your own good: benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33, 1421–1434 (2007).
Jost, J. T. & Kay, A. C. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88, 498–509 (2005).
Connelly, K. & Heesacker, M. Why is benevolent sexism appealing?: Associations with system justification and life satisfaction. Psychol. Women Q. 36, 432–443 (2012).
Brandt, M. J. Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1413–1418 (2011).
Schiralli, J. E., Peragine, D. E., Chasteen, A. L. & Einstein, G. Explicit and implicit gender-related stereotyping in transgender, gender expansive, and cisgender adults. Arch. Sex. Behav. 51, 2065–2076 (2022).
Khorashad, B. S., Roshan, G. M., Talaei, A., Arezoomandan, S. & Sadr, M. Views of individuals with gender dysphoria and disorders of sex development on sexism: an Iranian study. Int. J. Transgend. 20, 459–470 (2019).
Hammond, M. D., Milojev, P., Huang, Y. & Sibley, C. G. Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 9, 863–874 (2018).
Davis, T. M., Settles, I. H. & Jones, M. K. Standpoints and situatedness: examining the perception of benevolent sexism in Black and white undergraduate women and men. Psychol. Women Q. 46, 8–26 (2022).
Hayes, E.-R. & Swim, J. K. African, Asian, Latina/o, and European Americans’ responses to popular measures of sexist beliefs: some cautionary notes. Psychol. Women Q. 37, 155–166 (2013). This article highlights measurement invariance across ethnic/racial groups, pointing to the need to consider the cultural context of ambivalent sexism.
Cowie, L. J., Greaves, L. M. & Sibley, C. G. Sexuality and sexism: differences in ambivalent sexism across gender and sexual identity. Personal. Individ. Differ. 148, 85–89 (2019).
López-Sáez, M. Á., García-Dauder, D. & Montero, I. Correlate attitudes toward LGBT and sexism in Spanish psychology students. Front. Psychol. 11, 2063 (2020).
Pistella, J., Tanzilli, A., Ioverno, S., Lingiardi, V. & Baiocco, R. Sexism and attitudes toward same-sex parenting in a sample of heterosexuals and sexual minorities: the mediation effect of sexual stigma. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 15, 139–150 (2018).
Cross, E. J., Muise, A. & Hammond, M. D. Do scales measuring sexist attitudes have equivalent meaning for sexual minorities and majorities? Sex Roles 85, 707–720 (2021). This article describes how sexual orientation influences the meaning of items in the ambivalent sexism inventory, suggesting the need for further research on how sexism operates for sexual-minority individuals.
Deak, C. K., Hammond, M. D., Sibley, C. G. & Bulbulia, J. Individuals’ number of children is associated with benevolent sexism. PLoS One 16, e0252194 (2021).
Glick, P., Lameiras, M. & Castro, Y. R. Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism towards women and men. Sex Roles 47, 433–441 (2002).
Mikołajczak, M. & Pietrzak, J. Ambivalent sexism and religion: connected through values. Sex Roles 70, 387–399 (2014).
Burn, S. M. & Busso, J. Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychol. Women Q. 29, 412–418 (2005).
Maitner, A. T. & Henry, P. J. Ambivalent sexism in the United Arab Emirates: quantifying gender attitudes in a rapidly modernizing society. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 21, 831–843 (2018).
Taşdemir, N. & Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. The relationships between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students. Sex Roles 62, 420–426 (2010).
Haggard, M. C., Kaelen, R., Saroglou, V., Klein, O. & Rowatt, W. C. Religion’s role in the illusion of gender equality: supraliminal and subliminal religious priming increases benevolent sexism. Psychol. Relig. Spiritual. 11, 392–398 (2019).
Inglehart, R. Religion’s Sudden Decline: What’s Causing It, And What Comes Next? (Oxford Univ. Press, 2021).
Hellmer, K., Stenson, J. T. & Jylhä, K. M. What’s (not) underpinning ambivalent sexism?: revisiting the roles of ideology, religiosity, personality, demographics, and men’s facial hair in explaining hostile and benevolent sexism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 122, 29–37 (2018).
Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. & Duckitt, J. Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: the dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33, 160–172 (2007).
Phelan, J. E., Sanchez, D. T. & Broccoli, T. L. The danger in sexism: the links among fear of crime, benevolent sexism, and well-being. Sex Roles 62, 35–47 (2010).
Fitzgerald, H. N., McDonald, R., Thomas, R. & Shook, N. J. Disease avoidance: a predictor of sexist attitudes toward females. Curr. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01343-6 (2021).
Valved, T., Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Besta, T. & Martiny, S. E. Gender belief systems through the lens of culture — differences in precarious manhood beliefs and reactions to masculinity threat in Poland and Norway. Psychol. Men. Masc. 22, 265–276 (2021).
Fisher, M. I. & Hammond, M. D. Personal ties and prejudice: a meta-analysis of romantic attachment and ambivalent sexism. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 45, 1084–1098 (2019).
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B. & Zhu, L. The two faces of Adam: ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23, 1323–1334 (1997).
Masser, B. & Abrams, D. Reinforcing the glass ceiling: the consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles 51, 609–615 (2004).
Kahn, K. B., van Breen, J. A., Barreto, M. & Kaiser, C. R. When is women’s benevolent sexism associated with support for other women’s agentic responses to gender‐based threat? Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 60, 786–807 (2021).
Huang, Y., Sibley, C. G. & Osborne, D. Breast is best, but where? Hostile sexism underlies men’s opposition to breastfeeding in public. J. Soc. Issues 76, 219–238 (2020).
Zaikman, Y. & Marks, M. J. Ambivalent sexism and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles 71, 333–344 (2014).
Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., Hamm, N. R. & White, K. B. Perceptions of the woman who breastfeeds: the role of erotophobia, sexism, and attitudinal variables. Sex Roles 49, 379–388 (2003).
Sakalh‐Uğurlu, N. & Glick, P. Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. J. Sex. Res. 40, 296–302 (2003).
Blumell, L. E., Huemmer, J. & Sternadori, M. Protecting the ladies: benevolent sexism, heteronormativity, and partisanship in online discussions of gender-neutral bathrooms. Mass Commun. Soc. 22, 365–388 (2019).
Carnaghi, A., Maass, A. & Fasoli, F. Enhancing masculinity by slandering homosexuals: the role of homophobic epithets in heterosexual gender identity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37, 1655–1665 (2011).
Rollè, L., Sechi, C., Santoniccolo, F., Trombetta, T. & Brustia, P. The relationship between sexism, affective states, and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of heterosexual Italian people. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 19, 194–206 (2022).
Bosson, J. K., Prewitt-Freilino, J. L. & Taylor, J. N. Role rigidity: a problem of identity misclassification? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89, 552–565 (2005).
Rudman, L. A., Mescher, K. & Moss-Racusin, C. A. Reactions to gender egalitarian men: perceived feminization due to stigma-by-association. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 16, 572–599 (2013).
Konopka, K., Rajchert, J., Dominiak-Kochanek, M. & Roszak, J. The role of masculinity threat in homonegativity and transphobia. J. Homosex. 68, 802–829 (2021).
Uluboy, Z. & Husnu, S. Turkish speaking young adults attitudes toward transgender individuals: transphobia, homophobia and gender ideology. J. Homosex. 69, 101–119 (2022).
Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Piebinga, L. & Moya, M. How nice of us and how dumb of me: the effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. Sex Roles 62, 532–544 (2010).
Dumont, M., Sarlet, M. & Dardenne, B. Be too kind to a woman, she’ll feel incompetent: benevolent sexism shifts self-construal and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles 62, 545–553 (2010).
Forbes, G. B., Collinsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Braun, K. D. & Wise, L. M. Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles 56, 265–273 (2007).
Calogero, R. M. & Jost, J. T. Self-subjugation among women: exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 211–228 (2011).
Forbes, G. B. et al. Body dissatisfaction in college women and their mothers: cohort effects, developmental effects, and the influences of body size, sexism, and the thin body ideal. Sex Roles 53, 281–298 (2005).
Forbes, G. B. et al. Body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in three cultures: Argentina, Brazil, and the US. Sex Roles 66, 677–694 (2012).
Franzoi, S. L. Is female body esteem shaped by benevolent sexism? Sex Roles 44, 177–188 (2001).
Oswald, D. L., Franzoi, S. L. & Frost, K. A. Experiencing sexism and young women’s body esteem. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 31, 1112–1137 (2012).
Atkins, D. Looking Queer (Routledge, 2012).
Molix, L. Sex differences in cardiovascular health: does sexism influence women’s health? Am. J. Med. Sci. 348, 153–155 (2014).
Vogel, B. et al. The Lancet Women and Cardiovascular Disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030. Lancet 397, 2385–2438 (2021).
Lamarche, V. M., Seery, M. D., Kondrak, C. L., Saltsman, T. L. & Streamer, L. Clever girl: benevolent sexism and cardiovascular threat. Biol. Psychol. 149, 107781 (2020).
Salomon, K., Burgess, K. D. & Bosson, J. K. Flash fire and slow burn: women’s cardiovascular reactivity and recovery following hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 469–479 (2015). This is one of the few papers that examines physiological responses to ambivalent sexism, paving the way for an improved understanding of their impact on women’s health.
Dardenne, B. et al. Benevolent sexism alters executive brain responses. NeuroReport 24, 572–577 (2013).
Himmelstein, M. S., Kramer, B. L. & Springer, K. W. Stress in strong convictions: precarious manhood beliefs moderate cortisol reactivity to masculinity threats. Psychol. Men Masc. 20, 491–502 (2019).
Pacilli, M. G., Spaccatini, F., Giovannelli, I., Centrone, D. & Roccato, M. System justification moderates the relation between hostile (but not benevolent) sexism in the workplace and state anxiety: an experimental study. J. Soc. Psychol. 159, 474–481 (2019).
Spaccatini, F. & Roccato, M. The palliative function of sexism: individual sexism buffers the relationship between exposure to workplace sexism and psychological distress. Sex. Cult. 25, 767–785 (2021).
Lemonaki, E., Manstead, A. S. R. & Maio, G. R. Hostile sexism (de)motivates women’s social competition intentions: the contradictory role of emotions. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 54, 483–499 (2015).
Oswald, D. L., Baalbaki, M. & Kirkman, M. Experiences with benevolent sexism: scale development and associations with women’s well-being. Sex Roles 80, 362–380 (2019).
Bosson, J. K. & Vandello, J. A. Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 82–86 (2011).
Begany, J. J. & Milburn, M. A. Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychol. Men Masc. 3, 119–126 (2002).
Russell, B. L. & Trigg, K. Y. Tolerance of sexual harassment: an examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles 50, 565–573 (2004).
Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B. & Bohner, G. Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 111–125 (2003).
Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L. & Russell, B. L. How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles 57, 131–136 (2007).
Viki, G. T., Abrams, D. & Masser, B. Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law Hum. Behav. 28, 295–303 (2004).
Brownhalls, J. et al. Make it safe at night or teach women to fight? Sexism predicts views on men’s and women’s responsibility to reduce men’s violence toward women. Sex Roles 84, 183–195 (2021).
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Cooley, E., Cipolli, W. & Mehta, S. Race, ambivalent sexism, and perceptions of situations when police shoot black women. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 13, 127–138 (2022).
Rudman, L. A. & Mescher, K. Of animals and objects: men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38, 734–746 (2012).
Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L. & Fiske, S. T. From agents to objects: sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 540–551 (2011).
Viki, G. T. & Abrams, D. Infra-humanization: ambivalent sexism and the attribution of primary and secondary emotions to women. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 39, 492–499 (2003).
Connor, R. A. & Fiske, S. T. Not minding the gap: how hostile sexism encourages choice explanations for the gender income gap. Psychol. Women Q. 43, 22–36 (2019).
Sakalli-Ugurlu, N. & Beydogan, B. Turkish college students’ attitudes toward women managers: the effects of patriarchy, sexism, and gender differences. J. Psychol. 136, 647–656 (2002).
King, E. B. et al. Benevolent sexism at work: gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. J. Manag. 38, 1835–1866 (2012).
Biernat, M., Tocci, M. J. & Williams, J. C. The language of performance evaluations: gender-based shifts in content and consistency of judgment. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3, 186–192 (2012).
Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M. & Hoover, A. Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88, 658–672 (2005).
Cassidy, B. S. & Krendl, A. C. A crisis of competence: benevolent sexism affects evaluations of women’s competence. Sex Roles 81, 505–520 (2019).
Shnabel, N., Bar-Anan, Y., Kende, A., Bareket, O. & Lazar, Y. Help to perpetuate traditional gender roles: benevolent sexism increases engagement in dependency-oriented cross-gender helping. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 110, 55–75 (2016).
Reilly, E. D., Rackley, K. R. & Awad, G. H. Perceptions of male and female STEM aptitude: the moderating effect of benevolent and hostile sexism. J. Career Dev. 44, 159–173 (2017).
Becker, J. C., Glick, P., Ilic, M. & Bohner, G.Damned if she does, damned if she doesn’t: consequences of accepting versus confronting patronizing help for the female target and male actor. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 41, 761–773 (2011).
Good, J. J. & Rudman, L. A. When female applicants meet sexist interviewers: the costs of being a target of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles 62, 481–493 (2010).
Hideg, I. & Ferris, D. L. The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111, 706–727 (2016). This article provides an excellent empirical analysis of how benevolent sexism influences women’s workplace outcomes.
Farkas, T. & Leaper, C. Chivalry’s double-edged sword: how girls’ and boys’ paternalistic attitudes relate to their possible family and work selves. Sex Roles 74, 220–230 (2016).
Fernández, M. L., Castro, Y. R., Otero, M. C., Foltz, M. L. & Lorenzo, M. G. Sexism, vocational goals, and motivation as predictors of men’s and women’s career choice. Sex Roles 55, 267–272 (2006).
Montañés, P. et al. Intergenerational transmission of benevolent sexism from mothers to daughters and its relation to daughters’ academic performance and goals. Sex Roles 66, 468–478 (2012).
Gervais, S. J. & Vescio, T. K. The effect of patronizing behavior and control on men and women’s performance in stereotypically masculine domains. Sex Roles 66, 479–491 (2012).
Jones, K. et al. Negative consequence of benevolent sexism on efficacy and performance. Gend. Manag. Int. J. 29, 171–189 (2014).
Dardenne, B., Dumont, M. & Bollier, T. Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: consequences for women’s performance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93, 764–779 (2007).
Hideg, I. & Shen, W. Why still so few? A theoretical model of the role of benevolent sexism and career support in the continued underrepresentation of women in leadership positions. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 26, 287–303 (2019).
Wakefield, J. R. H., Hopkins, N. & Greenwood, R. M. Thanks, but no thanks: women’s avoidance of help-seeking in the context of a dependency-related stereotype. Psychol. Women Q. 36, 423–431 (2012).
Samulowitz, A., Gremyr, I., Eriksson, E. & Hensing, G. “Brave men” and “emotional women”: a theory-guided literature review on gender bias in health care and gendered norms towards patients with chronic pain. Pain. Res. Manag. 2018, 1–14 (2018).
Prego-Jimenez, S. et al. The impact of sexism and gender stereotypes on the legitimization of women’s low back pain. Pain Manag. Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2022.03.008 (2022).
Lee, J., Hardesty, L. A., Kunzler, N. M. & Rosenkrantz, A. B. Direct interactive public education by breast radiologists about screening mammography: impact on anxiety and empowerment. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 13, 12–20 (2016).
Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M. & McClellan, L. M. Benevolent sexism, perceived health risks, and the inclination to restrict pregnant women’s freedoms. Sex Roles 65, 596–605 (2011).
Huang, Y., Davies, P. G., Sibley, C. G. & Osborne, D. Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights: a multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42, 970–984 (2016).
Osborne, D. & Davies, P. G. When benevolence backfires: benevolent sexists’ opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42, 291–307 (2012).
Alotey, P., Ravindran, S. & Sathivelu, V. Trends in abortion policies in low- and middle-income countries. Annu. Rev. Public Health 42, 505–518 (2021).
Greubel, A. D. Benevolent sexism in the targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP): a case study of Texas House Bill 2. Sex Roles 85, 1–11 (2021).
Vilda, D. et al. State abortion policies and maternal death in the United States, 2015–2018. Am. J. Public Health 111, 1696–1704 (2021).
Duerksen, K. N. & Lawson, K. L. “Not brain-washed, but heart-washed”: a qualitative analysis of benevolent sexism in the anti-choice stance. Int. J. Behav. Med. 24, 864–870 (2017).
Rachlinski, J. J. & Wistrich, A. J. Benevolent sexism in judges. San. Diego Law Rev. 58, 101–142 (2021).
Jackman, M. R. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism And Conflict In Gender, Class, And Race Relations (Univ. California Press, 1994). This is a classic analysis of paternalism in three different intergroup contexts, which inspired ambivalent sexism theory and continues to inspire understandings of the complexity of prejudice.
Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. Dynamics within intimate relationships and the causes, consequences, and functions of sexist attitudes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26, 120–125 (2017).
Lamont, E. Negotiating courtship: reconciling egalitarian ideals with traditional gender norms. Gend. Soc. 28, 189–211 (2014).
Gul, P. & Kupfer, T. R. Benevolent sexism and mate preferences: why do women prefer benevolent men despite recognizing that they can be undermining? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 45, 146–161 (2019).
Cross, E. J. & Overall, N. C. Women’s attraction to benevolent sexism: needing relationship security predicts greater attraction to men who endorse benevolent sexism. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 48, 336–347 (2018).
Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., Glick, P. & Chen, Z. Ambivalent sexism in close relationships: (hostile) power and (benevolent) romance shape relationship ideals. Sex Roles 62, 583–601 (2010).
Travaglia, L. K., Overall, N. C. & Sibley, C. G. Benevolent and hostile sexism and preferences for romantic partners. Personal. Individ. Differ. 47, 599–604 (2009).
Paynter, A. & Leaper, C. Heterosexual dating double standards in undergraduate women and men. Sex Roles 75, 393–406 (2016).
Silván-Ferrero, M. D. P. & Bustillos López, A. Benevolent sexism toward men and women: justification of the traditional system and conventional gender roles in Spain. Sex Roles 57, 607–614 (2007).
Chen, Z., Fiske, S. T. & Lee, T. L. Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles 60, 765–778 (2009).
Gaunt, R. & Pinho, M. Do sexist mothers change more diapers? Ambivalent sexism, maternal gatekeeping, and the division of childcare. Sex Roles 79, 176–189 (2018).
Bareket, O., Shnabel, N., Kende, A., Knab, N. & Bar-Anan, Y. Need some help, honey? Dependency-oriented helping relations between women and men in the domestic sphere. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 120, 1175–1203 (2021).
Overall, N. C. & Hammond, M. D. How intimate relationships contribute to gender inequality: sexist attitudes encourage women to trade off career success for relationship security. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 5, 40–48 (2018).
Fitz, C. C. & Zucker, A. N. Everyday exposure to benevolent sexism and condom use among college women. Women Health 55, 245–262 (2015).
Harris, E. A., Hornsey, M. J. & Barlow, F. K. On the link between benevolent sexism and orgasm frequency in heterosexual women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 45, 1923–1931 (2016).
Harris, E. A., Hornsey, M. J., Larsen, H. F. & Barlow, F. K. Beliefs about gender predict faking orgasm in heterosexual women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 48, 2419–2433 (2019).
Chisango, T., Mayekiso, T. & Thomae, M. The social nature of benevolent sexism and the antisocial nature of hostile sexism: is benevolent sexism more likely to manifest in public contexts and hostile sexism in private contexts?: antisocial and social sexism. Int. J. Psychol. 50, 363–371 (2015).
Hammond, M. D., Overall, N. C. & Cross, E. J. Internalizing sexism within close relationships: perceptions of intimate partners’ benevolent sexism promote women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 110, 214–238 (2016). This particularly interesting paper focuses on sexism within couples, demonstrating the dynamic and interactive nature of these attitudes.
Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. Men’s hostile sexism and biased perceptions of partners’ support: underestimating dependability rather than overestimating challenges to dominance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46, 1491–1506 (2020).
Leaper, C., Gutierrez, B. C. & Farkas, T. Ambivalent sexism and reported relationship qualities in emerging adult heterosexual dating couples. Emerg. Adulthood 10, 776–787 (2020).
Cross, E. J., Overall, N. C., Low, R. S. T. & McNulty, J. K. An interdependence account of sexism and power: men’s hostile sexism, biased perceptions of low power, and relationship aggression. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 117, 338–363 (2019).
Overall, N. C., Chang, V. T., Cross, E. J., Low, R. S. T. & Henderson, A. M. E. Sexist attitudes predict family-based aggression during a COVID-19 lockdown. J. Fam. Psychol. 35, 1043–1052 (2021).
Alvarez, C., Lameiras-Fernandez, M., Holliday, C. N., Sabri, B. & Campbell, J. Latina and Caribbean immigrant women’s experiences with intimate partner violence: a story of ambivalent sexism. J. Interpers. Violence 36, 3831–3854 (2021).
Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. Benevolent sexism and support of romantic partner’s goals: undermining women’s competence while fulfilling men’s intimacy needs. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 1180–1194 (2015).
Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. When relationships do not live up to benevolent ideals: women’s benevolent sexism and sensitivity to relationship problems. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 43, 212–223 (2013).
Hammond, M. D. & Overall, N. C. Endorsing benevolent sexism magnifies willingness to dissolve relationships when facing partner-ideal discrepancies. Pers. Relatsh. 21, 272–287 (2014).
Cross, E. J., Overall, N. C. & Hammond, M. D. Perceiving partners to endorse benevolent sexism attenuates highly anxious women’s negative reactions to conflict. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42, 923–940 (2016).
Hashim, P. H., Michniewicz, K. & Richmond, K. Attitudes toward transnational surrogacy, ambivalent sexism, and views on financial allocation. Womens Reprod. Health https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2022.2062923 (2022).
Li, D. & Zheng, L. Intimate partner violence and controlling behavior among male same-sex relationships in China: relationship with ambivalent sexism. J. Interpers. Violence 36, 208–230 (2021).
Zhao, R. & Zheng, Y. Child development in same-sex families: beliefs of Chinese lesbians, gays, and heterosexuals. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 18, 588–597 (2021).
Ortiz-Ospira, E. & Tzvetkova, S. Working women: key facts and trends in female labor force participation. Our World In Data https://ourworldindata.org/female-labor-force-participation-key-facts (2017).
Lippa, R. A., Preston, K. & Penner, J. Women’s representation in 60 occupations from 1972 to 2010: more women in high-status jobs, few women in things-oriented jobs. PLoS One 9, e95960 (2014).
Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M. & Sczesny, S. Gender stereotypes have changed: a cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. Am. Psychol. 75, 301–315 (2020).
Donnelly, K. et al. Attitudes toward women’s work and family roles in the United States, 1976–2013. Psychol. Women Q. 40, 41–54 (2016).
Hegarty, P., Ansara, Y. G. & Barker, M.-J. in Gender, Sex, And Sexualities: Psychological Perspectives 53–76 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).
Xiao, L. & Wang, F. Examining the links between beauty ideals internalization, the objectification of women, and ambivalent sexism among Chinese women: the effects of sexual orientation. Arch. Sex. Behav. 50, 553–562 (2021).
Aktan, T. & Yalçındağ, B. Çelişik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Ölçeğinin (ÇDCÖ) Yeniden Gözden Geçirilmesi: Korumacı Cinsiyetçiliğin Yapı Geçerliliği ve ÇDCÖ’nün Ölçüm Değişmezliği. Psikol. Çalışmaları Stud. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2022-820401 (2022).
Trut, V., Sinovčić, P. & Milavić, B. Initial validation of the ambivalent sexism inventory in a military setting. Soc. Sci. 11, 176 (2022).
McMahon, J. M. & Kahn, K. B. Benevolent racism? The impact of target race on ambivalent sexism. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 19, 169–183 (2016).
Blumell, L. E. & Rodriguez, N. S. Ambivalent sexism and gay men in the US and UK. Sex. Cult. 24, 209–229 (2020).
Charlesworth, T. E. S. & Banaji, M. R. Patterns of implicit and explicit stereotype. III: Long-term change in gender stereotypes. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 13, 14–26 (2022).
Kite, M. E., Togans, L. J. & Schultz, T. J. in Cross-Cultural Psychology (ed. Keith, K. D.) 427–448 (Wiley, 2019).
Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T. & Sterling, J. Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined: neoliberal ideology and justification. J. Soc. Issues 75, 49–88 (2019).
Girerd, L. & Bonnot, V. Neoliberalism: an ideological barrier to feminist identification and collective action. Soc. Justice Res. 33, 81–109 (2020).
Huang, Y., Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. The gradual move toward gender equality: a 7-year latent growth model of ambivalent sexism. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 10, 335–344 (2019).
Gomes, A., Gonçalves, G., Sousa, C., Santos, J. & Giger, J.-C. Are we getting less sexist? A ten-year gap comparison analysis of sexism in a Portuguese sample. Psychol. Rep. 125, 2160–2177 (2022).
Jones, C. W., Mitchell, J. S. & Martin, J. D. Ambivalent sexism? Shifting patterns of gender bias in five Arab countries. Int. Stud. Q. 65, 277–293 (2021).
Mukkamala, S. & Suyemoto, K. L. Racialized sexism/sexualized racism: a multimethod study of intersectional experiences of discrimination for Asian American women. Asian Am. J. Psychol. 9, 32–46 (2018).
Buchanan, N. T. & Ormerod, A. J. Racialized sexual harassment in the lives of African American women. Women Ther. 25, 107–124 (2002).
Esqueda, C. W. & Harrison, L. A. The influence of gender role stereotypes, the woman’s race, and level of provocation and resistance on domestic violence culpability attributions. Sex Roles 53, 821–834 (2005).
Keddie, A. Disrupting (gendered) Islamophobia: the practice of feminist ijtihad to support the agency of young Muslim women. J. Gend. Stud. 27, 522–533 (2018).
Hamzeh, M. Pedagogies Of De-veiling: Muslim Girls And The Hijab Discourse (Information Age Publishing, 2012).
Gaunt, R. Breadwinning moms, caregiving dads: double standard in social judgments of gender norm violators. J. Fam. Issues 34, 3–24 (2013).
Bills, M. A. & Hayes, B. E. The association between adherence to sexist beliefs and traditional family norms, religion, and attitudes toward sexual minorities. J. Homosex. 69, 499–524 (2022).
Davies, M. Correlates of negative attitudes toward gay men: sexism, male role norms, and male sexuality. J. Sex. Res. 41, 259–266 (2004).
Sakalli, N. The relationship between sexism and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish college students. J. Homosex. 42, 53–64 (2002).
Jordan, J. A., Lawler, J. R. & Bosson, J. K. Ambivalent classism: the importance of assessing hostile and benevolent ideologies about poor people. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 43, 46–67 (2021).
Cary, L. A., Chasteen, A. L. & Remedios, J. The ambivalent ageism scale: developing and validating a scale to measure benevolent and hostile ageism. Gerontologist 57, e27–e36 (2016).
Nario‐Redmond, M. R., Kemerling, A. A. & Silverman, A. Hostile, benevolent, and ambivalent ableism: contemporary manifestations. J. Soc. Issues 75, 726–756 (2019).
Cuddy, A. J. C. et al. Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 48, 1–33 (2009).