The Perfect Enemy | A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW: Considering the Harm from the COVID Vaccines
September 27, 2022

A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW: Considering the Harm from the COVID Vaccines

A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW: Considering the Harm from the COVID Vaccines  Pagosa Daily Post

Read Time:5 Minute

Well, it seems that (as many of us instinctively sensed) the COVID-19 vaccines that were shoved down the public’s throat were not as effective, or safe, as the Biden administration and its stooges in the media told us. An article to be published in the December 2022 issue of Virology Journal will report the emerging evidence about COVID vaccines.

This from the abstract of the upcoming article.

“The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.”

It appears that immunity from the vaccines quickly wanes, and that boosters to maintain immunity are less effective than not being vaccinated at all.  Also, repeated boosters harm natural immune systems.  Could that be why so many vaccinated/boostered people, like Biden, have contracted COVID ?

And it’s not just that article.

UCLA Geffen School of Medicine Doctor Joseph Lapado and Yale School of Public Health Doctor Harvey Risch have written an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal calling into question Dr Fauci’s claims about the efficacy, and safety, of the vaccines versus acquired immunity from having had COVID.

“While you would never know it from listening to public-health officials, not a single published study has demonstrated that patients with a prior infection benefit from COVID-19 vaccination. That this isn’t readily acknowledged by the CDC or Anthony Fauci is an indication of how deeply entangled pandemic politics is in science”

“The large clustering of certain adverse events immediately after vaccination is concerning, and the silence around these potential signals of harm reflects the politics surrounding Covid-19 vaccines. Stigmatizing such concerns is bad for scientific integrity and could harm patients”

It was this week last year that I was admitted to a hospital COVID ward with the Delta variant – which damn near killed me. I previously wrote about the experience in this forum.

As I wrote, the science relating to COVID is not a matter of politics for me – it’s life and death.

I still am not vaccinated because of a high-risk of serious vaccine side-effects due to my cardiac condition. So far, my acquired natural immunity from surviving the Delta has kept me from being reinfected – even though I’ve been around (without a mask) multiple people during their contagious phase who have contracted the Omicron variant despite being vaccinated.

Many vaccinated people I know have suffered side-effects. One good friend has developed atrial fibrillation, a potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmia, which his doctor has attributed to the vaccine.

My heart, on the other hand, suffered no ill effect whatsoever from the Delta – and that is clinically documented. Only two months before I got the Delta, I’d had a heart attack and open-heart surgery. The condition of my heart was meticulously examined prior to my getting the Delta, and has been closely monitored since. Delta has not effected my heart at all – but the vaccine likely would.

As Drs Lapado and Risch repeatedly explain, from the outset the official CDC/DrFauci/Biden pronouncements about COVID vaccinations were all about politics, not science.

I recently wrote the same about mask mandates. I’m not a medical scientist. But I am a political scientist (my undergrad degree). So I recognize government propaganda when I smell it – and this the whole COVID sham didn’t pass the smell test from the beginning. As doctors Lapado and Risch point out:

“One remarkable aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic has been how often unpopular scientific ideas, from the lab-leak theory to the efficacy of masks, were initially dismissed, even ridiculed, only to resurface later in mainstream thinking.”

“Some scientists have raised concerns that the safety risks of COVID-19 vaccines have been underestimated. But the politics of vaccination has relegated their concerns to the outskirts of scientific thinking — for now.”

A sure fire way to tell when the government is bullshitting you is how vehemently they deny, and suppress, any questioning of the official line. Think back to how anyone who dared question the CDC and Saint Fauci were denounced and their opinions blocked from dissemination.

According to retired neurosurgeon Richard Blaylock, writing in the April 2022 issue of the Journal of Surgical Neurology,

“The media (TV, newspapers, magazines, etc), medical societies, state medical boards and the owners of social media have appointed themselves to be the sole source of information concerning this so-called “pandemic”. Websites have been removed, highly credentialed and experienced clinical doctors and scientific experts in the field of infectious diseases have been demonized, careers have been destroyed and all dissenting information has been labeled “misinformation” and “dangerous lies”, even when sourced from top experts in the fields of virology, infectious diseases, pulmonary critical care, and epidemiology. These blackouts of truth occur even when this information is backed by extensive scientific citations from some of the most qualified medical specialists in the world.”

Blaylock notes that suppression of questions about vaccines has encroached into scientific publications as well,

“We are now witnessing a growing number of excellent scientific papers, written by top experts in the field, being retracted from major medical and scientific journals weeks, months and even years after publication. A careful review indicates that in far too many instances the authors dared question accepted dogma by the controllers of scientific publications—especially concerning the safety, alternative treatments or efficacy of vaccines.”

“Accepted dogma” is science-speak for BS. The Blaylock article is lengthy but worth reading if you are interested in how the “dogma” became official gospel. (Hint – big pharma was a big part of it!)

This is not a conspiracy theory or “I told you so” column. The human deaths and suffering associated with COVID “dogma” are too tragic to trivialize with petty egotism.

I experienced a deeply spiritual, near death, encounter this time last year from COVID. Death came into my hospital room and invited me to join him. My only goal now, as a COVID survivor, is to raise as much awareness as possible about how the public have been mislead during this pandemic so they know the truth, to expose the culprits… and, hopefully, so it won’t happen again.

Gary Beatty

Gary Beatty lives between Florida and Pagosa Springs. He retired after 30 years as a prosecutor for the State of Florida, has a doctorate in law, is Board Certified in Criminal Trial law by the Florida Supreme Court, and is now a law professor.