The Perfect Enemy | 25% of people believe harassing public health officials is OK
August 11, 2022

25% of people believe harassing public health officials is OK

25% of people believe harassing public health officials is OK  Medical Economics

Read Time:1 Minute

The COVID-19 brought out the worst in many people, and a study from Johns Hopkins University illustrates just how extreme it became.

Public health officials, who were tasked with trying to prevent the spread of COVID and protect the health of their constituents often became targets of right-wing media pundits who often accused them of limiting the freedom of citizens, resulting in harassment and threats from the public. A survey showed that approximately 40% of public health leaders were harassed.

The study of 1086 adults found that the share of those that believed harassing public officials over business closures was justified was 25% in August 2021, up from 20% in November 2020. Similarly, the number of people who thought it was justified to threaten public health officials rose from 15% to 21% in that same timeframe.

The study was published in JAMA Network Open.

The antagonism toward public health officials was concentrated among those doubting science and groups most negatively affected by the pandemic – those with lower income and less education – these beliefs have shifted toward other groups, as well. Researchers found increases in negative views among high earners, political independents, the educated, and those more trusting of science.

According to the report, the findings reveal increasingly partisan attitudes toward public health officials themselves, with respondents believing that attacks on public health officials were justified in November 2020 also believing that attacks on politicians were justified. This finding aligns with the general politicization of the pandemic but could also reflect the conflation of public health officials and political leaders or the view that public health officials make inherently political decisions.

“The pandemic revealed the difficulty of providing nonpartisan, evidence-based communication on divisive topics. This challenge has been further exacerbated by a quickly shifting evidence base and misinformation,” the report reads in part.